.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Friday, June 24, 2011

jennifer esposito actress

images Jennifer Esposito Jennifer jennifer esposito actress. jennifer esposito actress.
  • jennifer esposito actress.



  • sroyc
    10-20 02:26 PM
    Since we cannot vote and influence the outcome of the presidential elections in any way, let's focus on what we can influence - legislation related to EB immigration.

    I don't think either Obama or McCain will reject relief for EB immigrants stuck in the backlog. The challenge for us is (and has always been) getting such a bill through the House and the Senate. Let's try to figure out how we can do that instead of bickering over something we don't have any control over.





    wallpaper jennifer esposito actress. jennifer esposito actress. CRASH star JENNIFER ESPOSITO
  • CRASH star JENNIFER ESPOSITO



  • acecupid
    07-03 12:50 PM
    I remember there was a proposal to give one Green Card per family to eliminate the retrogression for EB categories. I don't know what happen to that. It was like one year ago or so.

    Thats a wonderful idea. Amen to that!





    jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito
  • Jennifer Esposito



  • forever_waiting
    02-11 05:17 PM
    Just a friendly thought from a co-member, If you are motivated to attend the advocacy event, why dont you consider sponsoring your travel? We should try to keep the donated miles/hotel points for on-the-edge members who we will have to try convince at the last moment when we closer to April.
    Motivated members who believe in this event should come forward and sponsor themselves and consider it as a contribution to the event. We are not doing anyone else a favor by travelling to DC - this is for our own good.

    -Attending the advocacy day.

    I will attend the event. I want someone to sponsor my airfare and stay.





    2011 CRASH star JENNIFER ESPOSITO jennifer esposito actress. jennifer esposito actress
  • jennifer esposito actress



  • tejonidhi
    09-10 04:23 PM
    i guess they were very happy that they discussed the horse issue and they decided to take a well deserved break...as for 5882 who cares, as one poster mentioned, the horses are US citizens and they support the economy by eating grass. Republicans are happy because legal horses will be eating legal grass as opposed to illegals cutting and shipping grass to the horses. Democrats will be happy because the horses are well looked after.

    ... i am just venting but i think this is a sign of the times we live in :D .To the folks who say that everything will be ok with the new Prez comes, remember the congress will mostly stay the same.

    where do we stand. I thought we are legal horses.



    more...


    jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Picture
  • Jennifer Esposito Picture



  • gcgonewild
    06-11 03:22 PM
    Sent to NJ Lawmakers





    jennifer esposito actress. The Poo and Jennifer Esposito.
  • The Poo and Jennifer Esposito.



  • pointlesswait
    02-03 11:59 AM
    To change the country quota.. you will have the change the entire US theory of melting pot. just a quick search on wiki will enlighten you about the history behind the country quota.. which was first enacted in 1924.

    SO IV will look like Don quixote..trying to go after the unthinkable.

    i agree with this quota system.. US has seen London become Londonisthan.. i am sure they wont let US to be overwhelmed by ppl from one country..

    our best bet would be:
    a.) Ask for transparency
    b.) One time capture of unused GC from past 10 years.

    something more realistic..



    more...


    jennifer esposito actress. Actress Jennifer Esposito
  • Actress Jennifer Esposito



  • vjkypally
    09-26 10:04 AM
    I also sent a note





    2010 Jennifer Esposito jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Jennifer
  • Jennifer Esposito Jennifer



  • ramus
    07-02 06:07 PM
    Thank you... Every drop in the ocean counts.
    There are 1200 members online... Once you contribute please put link of this thread in our main thread..

    Thanks a lot.



    contributed 100 just now, my drop in the ocean, I will try to add more drops in coming days.



    more...


    jennifer esposito actress. JENNIFER ESPOSITO ACTRESS
  • JENNIFER ESPOSITO ACTRESS



  • EkAurAaya
    07-16 07:38 PM
    I've so many hard working American friends... it really make me want to work harder to compete with them, but these bunch of cry babies at Numbers are scared of skilled workers, they don't want to upgrade their skills, they want to work 9-5 and get paid for their incompetencies.





    hair jennifer esposito actress jennifer esposito actress. Photo of Jennifer Esposito
  • Photo of Jennifer Esposito



  • Jbpvisa
    07-12 11:01 PM
    http://www.murthy.com/chertoff_murthy.html

    July 12, 2007

    VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
    Michael Chertoff, Esq.
    Secretary
    Department of Homeland Security


    RE: USCIS Decision to Reject I-485 Filings

    Dear Mr. Chertoff:

    It was a pleasure and an honor to meet with you and to share my views during your panel discussion at the Harvard Worldwide Congress June 15, 2007 in Washington, D.C. I understand and appreciate that the responsibility vested in you as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is no simple task. We applaud your service to our nation. After meeting with you personally and speaking with you, I am more convinced than ever that you will do the right thing for our country and for the people you serve, both in terms of securing our nation and in being the leader of the DHS, with over 20 federal agencies reporting to you, including the USCIS.

    Purpose of this Letter

    I am writing to you at this time to address recent actions by the USCIS to refuse to accept I-485 adjustment of status filing during July 2007 that are having significant impact upon the reliability of the legal immigration system in this country, as well as impacting legal foreign nationals and the many U.S. businesses that rely upon the work they perform.

    USCIS Decision Contradicts its Long Standing Procedure

    In contradiction of its own long standing policy and procedure, we understand that the USCIS, through its Director Gonzalez, contacted the U.S. Department of State (DOS) and requested or required the DOS to issue a �revised� Visa Bulletin on July 2, 2007. The USCIS then used the revised Bulletin to refuse to accept I-485 filings. This decision deprives thousands of foreign nationals, and their families, of the rights and privileges that are attendant to the I-485 filing.

    These Highly Skilled Professionals Followed All the Rules and Believe in the American Dream

    These professionals and their employers have played by our established immigration laws and rules. The vast majority of these thousands of potential applicants has a U.S. employer corporation, university or other business as a sponsor for permanent resident status. The exceptions from an employer are for those who are considered of �extraordinary ability� or whose work is in our �national interest.� Many of these applicants have completed their Bachelor�s, Master�s and/or PhD programs from U.S. universities. They believe in the opportunities of this great nation and strive to achieve the American Dream by following all the rules, working hard, paying taxes, and striving to do the right thing. They believe in this country, and rely upon our systems, our government, and our processes. Unfortunately, on July 2, 2007, we let them down. The USCIS abandoned its own system and long standing practices. This happened through manipulation of the use of visa numbers, insisting upon the issuance of a "revised visa bulletin," and instituting the USCIS policy of rejecting every employment-based I-485 that could have been filed during the month of July 2007.

    USCIS Decision Denies Substantive and Procedural Rights to Highly Skilled Workers and Their Employers - Many of Whom Have Already Suffered and Will Suffer Further Harm/ Injury

    Not only does the USCIS' action harm the individuals and employers involved, it undermines the reliability of our entire employment-based immigration system. The unexpected decision of the USCIS to refuse to accept any I-485 filings denies both substantive and procedural due process rights to would be applicants across the U.S. All of these applicants are employment based (EB) applicants who are primarily highly skilled professionals or experienced workers, that the U.S. seeks in high demand areas, including: science, technology, medicine, research, business, academia, and education.

    The harm in not accepting the filings in July 2007 goes beyond mere delay. In reliance upon the July Visa Bulletin, starting in mid-June 2007, these applicants took the steps necessary to prepare their filings and made decisions in reliance upon the USCIS accepting their filings during July 2007. In order to be present in the U.S., as required for these filings, many applicants and their families canceled travel plans abroad or arranged to return to the U.S. on short notice missing family weddings and other important life events. They undertook medical examinations and paid for the required tests which must accompany the I-485 filings. (The USCIS had refused to waive this requirement even temporarily.) They hired lawyers to process their paperwork; they arranged to obtain documents from abroad on an expedited basis, involving foreign lawyers and foreign governments, all at a significant cost. They made employment and other strategic immigration related decisions to be able to process their I-485s for them and their families. Some canceled visa appointments at the consulates, or withdrew other immigration filings, all in reliance upon the USCIS accepting I-485 filings during July 2007.

    The applicants and their employers lose the rights and privileges that accompany the filing of the I-485. These include eligibility for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) and Advanced Parole (AP), thus eliminating the need for the individuals and their employers to make the filings necessary to maintain a non-immigrant, temporary status. These same ancillary benefits also apply to dependant family members. Most importantly, those that have not filed I-485s are not eligible for "portability" benefits under the �American Competitiveness in the Twenty First Century Act� of Oct. 2000 or �AC21� as it is sometimes referred to. This ineligibility for AC21 portability forces career stagnation. This is to the detriment of the individual as well as their sponsoring employer. Under AC21 portability, employers can promote and/or relocate employees to positions that are the same or similar job classifications as the positions for which they were initially sponsored. Individuals can utilize these provisions for career advancement, and for entrepreneurship. Given that the green card process often spans many years, AC21 portability allows the necessary flexibility to permit the case to continue, to accommodate changes in the sponsoring employer's needs as well as opportunities that are specific to the beneficiary.

    The list of stories of individuals and families harmed by the USCIS decision is endless. We have for example, many spouses who will now be separated potentially for years on end, as one received a green card during the USCIS' June "rush," while the other is now ineligible to file.

    The USCIS decision also created a burden on U.S. employers. Further delays in the green card process mean that, at best, U.S. employers have to continue to file temporary petitions to keep their workforce in the U.S. legally; at worst, it jeopardizes the availability of this needed highly educated and skilled workforce.

    USCIS Motive is to Collect Millions of Additional Filing Fees

    Many are baffled by the USCIS decision to reject I-485 filings in July, and its use of the �revised� Visa Bulletin as an excuse. The suspected motive is the collection of the substantially higher filing fees that will be generated after July 27, 2007. This entire incident sends the wrong message about our government, our policies and our legal system reeking of greed and inconsistency. Even the appearance of such impropriety undermines our system.

    .................
    continue



    more...


    jennifer esposito actress. Actress Jennifer Esposito
  • Actress Jennifer Esposito



  • coopheal
    03-20 08:43 AM
    I agree with you man. These screwed up desi consulting firms sell LCs like it is walmart. And people who work for them don't care about the position offered or their qualifications. They just want to have multiple LCs and I-140s and then cut the line when it is convenient.

    Don�t do character assassination of EB3 applicants. EB3s who now have qualifications/job for EB2 should definitely try to convert over to EB2. EB3s don�t listen to people like these. It�s the same mentality which opposes eliminating country limits; more over its same mentality which opposes EB reforms. Grow up��

    Trying to stop an EB3 person who spent more time than you in GC queue and has qualification for EB2 is just insane.





    hot Jennifer Esposito Picture jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito
  • Jennifer Esposito



  • grinch
    03-19 02:58 PM
    Move this to Completed Battles?



    more...


    house Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito arrives at the premiere of jennifer esposito actress. and Jennifer Esposito Nope
  • and Jennifer Esposito Nope



  • EB2IndianGC
    09-23 01:48 PM
    We got approval email for myself + spouse and daughter today. I had waited for this since 2002. :)
    Your Case Status: Card/ Document Production

    On September 23, 2010, we ordered production of your new card. Please allow 30 days for your card to be mailed to you. If we need something from you we will contact you. If you move before you receive the card, call customer service at 1-800-375-5283.


    This step applies to applications that result in an applicant receiving a card (such as a "green card") or other document (such as a naturalization certificate, employment authorization document, travel document, or advance parole). Applications will be in this step from the time the order to produce the card/document is given until the card/document is produced and mailed to the applicant. You can expect to receive your card/document within 30 days of the approval of your application.

    If you do not receive your document, please contact our National Customer Service Center at 1-800-375-5283.

    Congratulations on your GC approval. Do you know how long it generally takes after responding to a RFE to see change in your status?





    tattoo The Poo and Jennifer Esposito. jennifer esposito actress. pictures Actress Jennifer
  • pictures Actress Jennifer



  • pcs
    11-10 09:18 PM
    Pappu, Aman et all...

    Let push it... this is too uch for too long !!!!

    Let us have a call on this. This is high time, we do something to mobilize guys for some common cause.



    more...


    pictures Actress Jennifer Esposito jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito attends the #39;#39;Be My Valentine#39;#39;
  • Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito attends the #39;#39;Be My Valentine#39;#39;



  • prioritydate
    06-29 05:06 PM
    I am really happy for all those people who got their GC :)





    dresses Jennifer Esposito jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Biography
  • Jennifer Esposito Biography



  • lvinaykumar
    05-21 10:15 AM
    Congrats, Please keep supporting IV



    more...


    makeup JENNIFER ESPOSITO ACTRESS jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito arrives at the premiere of
  • Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito arrives at the premiere of



  • actaccord
    02-17 03:38 PM
    have the process/steps on how to redeem those air miles ?





    girlfriend pictures Actress Jennifer jennifer esposito actress. latest jennifer esposito
  • latest jennifer esposito



  • gceverywhere
    09-19 12:01 PM
    Thank you. I believe that we should register legalimmigrationvoice.org (and not .com) as we are a non-profit organization.

    Can you please get that registered as well?

    I have registered this domain. If needed, please send me PM; I can initiate the transfer process. I have already added a forwarding address to the immigrationvoice.com.

    This is my from of contribution.





    hairstyles Actress Jennifer Esposito jennifer esposito actress. Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito attends the #39;#39;Be My Valentine#39;#39;
  • Jennifer Esposito Actress Jennifer Esposito attends the #39;#39;Be My Valentine#39;#39;



  • alisa
    01-23 06:33 AM
    I agree, at some point, things break even, because people will frankly get fed up and leave. That point will be somewhere between 10-20 years. And we will then be congratulating the two or three Indians who wait this out.

    This was just an attempt to model in the absence of reliable information, and to try and get as reliable information as can possible be got. I wish we could get more data and links here than we currently have (just one I think.)

    The modelling on this thread shows wait times of 15-20 years for India, about 5 years for ROW, and somewhere in between for China (I think China will be closer to ROW than India just because their backlogs for 2001 and 2002 were one fourth that of India.)

    The purpose of the exercise was to estimate wait times based on some solid data. Who is getting screwed, and by how much. (Looks like, the answer to 'who' is Indians, and the answer to 'how much' is 'A lot'.)

    People will naturally not wait for 20 years to get a greencard. Either things will be fixed, or people will start leaving.



    I think thigns break even at some point. It is so frustrating that it becomes no longer attractive to pursue GC (If we have not already reached that point).
    You got to be open to change to survive, be it a person or a country. No point in predicting death before GC or any such extreme cases. It will definetely take as long as it needs. Its basic capitalism at best , supply and demand. You can't beat that.

    Nothing wrong in trying to change the course though.





    coldcloud
    06-10 09:14 PM
    what the heck r u talking. i just renewed my EAD myself, no employment letter, no pay slip, no crap. Don't blabber if you dont know the details.

    Is this forum for letting every body know off what is coming and wake us to act are show off that I have an EAD and I escape from this situation and you are the ones caught in this? Are you not ashamed of your self? Did you read Pappu's initial posting fully?





    nk2006
    12-27 08:54 AM
    GUYS THIS SEEMS INCORRECT, I HAVE A 529 FOR BOTH MY BOYS......MY FINANCIAL BROKER SET IT UP FOR ME..

    I also have opened 529 account couple years ago (and contributing to it monthly ever since). No issues (no questions were asked about my visa status) while opening or during my monthly contributions. My understanding is, we can use these funds anywhere in the world as long as the money taken out is used for higher educaiton of designated beneficiary.

    The biggest disadvantage for us is in our jobs - so many jobs are advertised with a clear mention that they dont support visa. This is not restricted to some mom and pop tech shops even some bigger companies do that. Also in big companies where H1B's are welcomed (like Cisco, Microsoft etc); they dont take you if you have less remaning time on your H1B. I knew a case where a friend of mine was interviewed and offered a very good position in one such reputed companies. The interview/background check process took two/three months at the end of it they realized that the personal have only 1year 4months left on his H1B visa. So they told him they wont take him; reason given is company policy that they need atleast 2 years on your H1B so that they have enough time to sponsor greencard etc. There are so many such instances where we are losing big time on our careers in the peak of our lifes.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment